Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: an overview of current practice and evidence
Publication date
2024-04
Authors
Ali, Samir
Meuwese, Christiaan L
Moors, Xavier J R
Donker, Dirk
van de Koolwijk, Anina F
van de Poll, Marcel C G
Gommers, Diederik
Dos Reis Miranda, Dinis
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Cardiac arrest (CA) is a common and potentially avoidable cause of death, while constituting a substantial public health burden. Although survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have improved in recent decades, the prognosis for refractory OHCA remains poor. The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly being considered to support rescue measures when conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) fails. ECPR enables immediate haemodynamic and respiratory stabilisation of patients with CA who are refractory to conventional CPR and thereby reduces the low-flow time, promoting favourable neurological outcomes. In the case of refractory OHCA, multiple studies have shown beneficial effects in specific patient categories. However, ECPR might be more effective if it is implemented in the pre-hospital setting to reduce the low-flow time, thereby limiting permanent brain damage. The ongoing ON-SCENE trial might provide a definitive answer regarding the effectiveness of ECPR. The aim of this narrative review is to present the most recent literature available on ECPR and its current developments.
Keywords
Advanced cardiac life support, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Journal Article, Review
Citation
Ali, S, Meuwese, C L, Moors, X J R, Donker, D W, van de Koolwijk, A F, van de Poll, M C G, Gommers, D & Dos Reis Miranda, D 2024, 'Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest : an overview of current practice and evidence', Netherlands Heart Journal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5