Geostatistical mapping of real estate prices: An empirical comparison of kriging and cokriging
Files
Publication date
2014
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Small-sized housing samples and price predictions at nonobserved locations require geostatistical approaches, particularly the kriging estimator. Nevertheless, geostatistics has thus far received little attention in real estate economics. The article’s objective is to empirically compare the prediction accuracy of univariate kriging variants, namely detrended kriging (DK) and universal kriging (UK), and multivariate extensions, including detrended cokriging (DCK) and universal cokriging (UCK). Both latter methods consider structural and neighborhood characteristics as auxiliary variables. While the price surfaces of DK and UK show nearly identical cross-validated accuracies, the cross-validation-based prediction accuracy of DCK and UCK differ in favor of the latter. If real estate agencies are faced with a univariate sample of property prices, either DK or UK can be used, while in the multivariate case, UCK is recommended, although numerically more complex.
Keywords
real estate, housing, geostatistics, kriging, price prediction, Vienna (Austria)
Citation
Kuntz, M & Helbich, M 2014, 'Geostatistical mapping of real estate prices: An empirical comparison of kriging and cokriging', International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 29, pp. 1904–1921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.906041