Effect of a Standardized Family Participation Program in the ICU: A Multicenter Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Publication date

2024-03-01

Authors

from the EFfect of FAMily PARTicipation in essential care (EFFAMPART) Study Group

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of a standardized program for family participation in essential care activities in the ICU on symptoms of anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress and satisfaction among relatives, and perceptions and experiences of ICU healthcare providers (HCPs). DESIGN: Multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Seven adult ICUs, one university, and six general teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred six relatives and 235 ICU HCPs. INTERVENTIONS: A standardized program to facilitate family participation inpatient communication, amusement/distraction, comfort, personal care, breathing, mobilization, and nutrition. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected through surveys among relatives and ICU HCPs. There were no significant differences in symptoms of anxiety in relatives in the intervention period compared with the control period (median Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] 5 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-10] vs 6 [IQR 3-9]; median ratio [MR] 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46-1.13; p = 0.15), depression (median HADS 4 [IQR 2-6] vs 3 [IQR 1-6]; MR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55-1.32; p = 0.47) or posttraumatic stress (median Impact of Event Scale-Revised score 0.45 [IQR 0.27-0.82] vs 0.41 [IQR 0.14-1]; MR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.14; p = 0.54). Reported satisfaction was slightly lower in the intervention period (mean 8.90 [sd 1.10] vs mean 9.06 [sd 1.10], difference -0.60; 95% CI, -1.07 to -0.12; p = 0.01). ICU HCPs perceived that more relatives knew how to participate: 47% in the intervention period versus 22% in the control period (odds ratio [OR] 3.15; 95% CI, 1.64-6.05; p < 0.01). They also reported relatives having sufficient knowledge (41% vs 16%; OR 3.56; 95% CI, 1.75-7.25; p < 0.01) and skills (44% vs 25%; OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.22-4.63; p = 0.01) to apply family participation. CONCLUSIONS: Application of a standardized program to facilitate family participation did not change mental health symptoms in relatives of ICU patients 3 months after discharge. ICU HCPs reported increased clarity, knowledge, and skills among relatives and ICU HCPs.

Keywords

anxiety, critical care, depression, essential care, family participation, family-centered care, intensive care unit, nursing, post-intensive care syndrome, posttraumatic stress disorder, relatives, satisfaction, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Citation

from the EFfect of FAMily PARTicipation in essential care (EFFAMPART) Study Group 2024, 'Effect of a Standardized Family Participation Program in the ICU : A Multicenter Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial', Critical care medicine, vol. 52, no. 3, 6093, pp. 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006093