Transmission routes of ESBL/pAmpC producing bacteria in the broiler production pyramid, a literature review

Publication date

2019-01-01

Authors

Korevaar, M.A.ISNI 0000000506014726
Fischer, EgilORCID 0000-0002-0599-701XISNI 0000000388292468
van der Goot, Jeanet
Stegeman, ArjanISNI 0000000388528223
Mevius, DikISNI 0000000394318601

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Plasmid mediated Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase and AmpC Beta-Lactamase (ESBL/pAmpC) producing bacteria are resistant to beta-lactam antimicrobials and are widespread in humans, the environment and animals. Animals, especially broilers, are an important reservoir of ESBL/pAmpC producing bacteria. To control ESBL/pAmpC prevalence in broilers, transmission within the entire broiler production pyramid should be considered. This study, including 103 articles originating from two electronic databases, searched for evidence for possible routes of transmission of ESBL/pAmpC producing bacteria in the broiler production pyramid. Possible routes of transmission were categorised as 1) vertical between generations, 2) at hatcheries, 3) horizontal on farm, and 4) horizontal between farms and via the environment of farms. This review presents indications for transmission of ESBL/pAmpC producing bacteria for each of these routes. However, the lack of quantitative results in the literature did not allow an estimation of the relative contribution or magnitude of the different routes. Future research should be specifically targeted towards such information as it is crucial to guide reduction strategies for the spread of ESBL/pAmpC producing bacteria in the broiler production chain.

Keywords

Antimicrobial resistance, Evidence, Mechanisms, Poultry, Spread, Taverne, Food Animals, Animal Science and Zoology

Citation

Dame-Korevaar, A, Fischer, E A J, van der Goot, J, Stegeman, A & Mevius, D 2019, 'Transmission routes of ESBL/pAmpC producing bacteria in the broiler production pyramid, a literature review', Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 162, pp. 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.12.002