Challenges in delineation for Ewing Sarcoma of the chest wall and pelvis: Results of a QUARTET – Euro-Ewing Consortium joint workshop

Publication date

2026-06

Authors

Lo Greco, Maria Chiara
Hertsyk, Volha
Christiaens, Melissa
Claude, Line
Corning, Coreen
d'Ippolito, Emma
Fajardo, Raquel Dávila
Dieckmann, Karin
Engellau, Jacob
Gains, Jenny

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

Introduction: Despite existing radiotherapy contouring guidelines for Ewing's Sarcoma (ES), important gaps remain for certain anatomical sites. The Euro-Ewing Consortium radiotherapy committee collaborated with QUARTET to identify and address ambiguities through consensus statements. Material and methods: Between September 2023 and March 2025, a series of delineation workshops were held using two previously treated cases: a pelvic ES treated with radical radiotherapy and a chest wall ES treated post-operatively. The requested structures included GTVp_Pre, GTVp_Post, CTVp_Pre_4500 and CTVp_Post_5400 for both cases; as well as CTVp_Post_6000 for pelvic case and CTVp_Lung_1500 for chest wall case. Visual and quantitative analyses were performed. Results: For the pelvic case, substantial variability was observed in the CTVp_Pre_4500, CTVp_Post_5400, and CTVp_Post_6000 volumes. As differences were primarily related to adjustments at anatomical barriers, participants agreed to consider compartmental fascia as natural barriers in the absence of infiltration, and to apply a 0.5-cm margin beyond the barrier when the ES is in direct contact. For the chest wall case, variability in GTVp_Pre and GTVp_Post were related to changes between pre- and post-operative anatomy and reflected in CTVp_Pre_4500 and CTVp_Post_5400 delineation. It was therefore agreed that non-infiltrated surfaces in contact with the tumour before surgery should be included in the GTVp_Pre. Standard margins should be applied to generate CTVp_Pre_4500, which should then be edited to avoid the skin, lungs, and heart while ensuring inclusion of the surgical bed. Conclusions: The delineation workshops highlighted significant inter-clinician variability in target definition for ES. The resulting consensus statements will be used to supplement existing resources and support clinicians.

Keywords

Ewing sarcoma, Frequency of inclusion, Interobserver variability, Radiotherapy, Target volume delineation, Dentistry (miscellaneous), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous), Hematology, Oncology, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Citation

Lo Greco, M C, Hertsyk, V, Christiaens, M, Claude, L, Corning, C, d'Ippolito, E, Davila-Fajardo, R, Dieckmann, K, Engellau, J, Gains, J, Greto, D, Lin, Y L, Magelssen, H, Mandeville, H, Martin, V, Sendiuliene, D, Timmermann, B, Turcas, A, Zadravec Zaletel, L, Kelly, S & Safwat, A 2026, 'Challenges in delineation for Ewing Sarcoma of the chest wall and pelvis : Results of a QUARTET – Euro-Ewing Consortium joint workshop', EJC Paediatric Oncology, vol. 7, 100522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100522