Moral Impression Management: Evaluation by an In-Group Member During a Moral IAT Affects Perceptual Attention and Conflict and Response Monitoring

Publication date

2015-01-01

Authors

van Nunspeet, F.ISNI 0000000436371946
Derks, B.ISNI 0000000399441078
Ellemers, N.ISNI 0000000116316251
Nieuwenhuis, Sander

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Previous research revealed that emphasizing morality increases motivational processes that improve people’s task performance. Here we examined whether this emphasis differentially affects people’s performance in the presence of an in-group compared to an out-group member. Ostensibly while being evaluated by another person, participants performed an Implicit Association Test that was framed as a test of either their morality or their competence. Results showed a smaller bias toward Muslim women in the morality compared to the competence condition, but this effect was more pronounced when participants were evaluated by a member of their minimal in-group. Moreover, in that same condition, event-related potentials revealed increased perceptual attention (N1) and affected conflict and response monitoring (N450 and error-related negativity). These findings suggest that being moral is especially important when monitored by the in-group and reveal the cognitive processes associated with controlling intergroup bias in a social situation.

Keywords

attitudes, categorization, control, intergroup processes, morality, motivation and performance, prejudice/stereotyping, self/identity, social identity, Taverne, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology

Citation

van Nunspeet, F, Derks, B, Ellemers, N & Nieuwenhuis, S 2015, 'Moral Impression Management : Evaluation by an In-Group Member During a Moral IAT Affects Perceptual Attention and Conflict and Response Monitoring', Social Psychological and Personality Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614548076