Evaluating the translational value of preclinical models: Available tools and frameworks, challenges and strategies

Publication date

2026-01

Authors

Pistollato, Francesca
Furtmann, Fabia
Straccia, Marco
Avey, Marc
Azilagbetor, David Mawufemor
Camp, Celean
Delaney, Conor
Ferreira, Guilherme S.
Garcia-Bermejo, Maria Laura
Gastaldello, Annalisa

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

Recent global initiatives are accelerating the shift toward human-centric approaches, reducing reliance on animal models in preclinical research and other domains. In this changing landscape, objectively evaluating the scientific relevance and merit of research involving animal models, and assessing their translational relevance is increasingly critical. Over the past decade, several tools have been developed to assess translational relevance, accuracy/appropriateness and efficacy of preclinical animal models, evaluate risk-of-bias in preclinical research, support harm–benefit analyses, and facilitate the adoption of non-animal replacement strategies. However, the uptake of such tools remains limited. To address this, a Biomedical Research for the 21st Century (BioMed21) Collaboration workshop on ‘Evaluating translational value of animal models in preclinical research — Tools, challenges, and strategies’, was convened by Humane World for Animals (30 June–1 July 2025). The event brought together tool developers and diverse global interest-holders to review current assessment tools, discuss their strengths, complementarity, limitations and feasibility, and explore opportunities for cross-sector collaboration. This paper summarises key outcomes of these presentations and discussions, highlighting knowledge gaps and barriers to the adoption of these tools and frameworks by researchers, funders and regulators. Strategies to raise awareness and promote the use of the tools and frameworks, to better inform funding decisions, regulatory approval and the appraisal of preclinical research, are also proposed.

Keywords

3Rs, animal models, assessment tools, NAMs, non-animal approaches, preclinical research, replacement, Three Rs, translational relevance, General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology, Toxicology, Medical Laboratory Technology

Citation

Pistollato, F, Furtmann, F, Straccia, M, Avey, M, Azilagbetor, D M, Camp, C, Delaney, C, Ferreira, G S, Garcia-Bermejo, M L, Gastaldello, A, Gurusamy, K, Holden, L, Kimmelman, J, Lohse, S, Marigliani, B, Menon, J M L, Ritskes-Hoitinga, M, Sarasija, S, Tagle, D, Tripodi, I J, Turner, J, Wehling, M & Costantino, H 2026, 'Evaluating the translational value of preclinical models : Available tools and frameworks, challenges and strategies', Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 10-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929251398821