ADVANCE system testing: Can coverage of pertussis vaccination be estimated in European countries using electronic healthcare databases: An example
Publication date
2020-12-22
Authors
Emborg, Hanne-Dorthe
Kahlert, Johnny
Braeye, Toon
Bauwens, Jorgen
Bollaerts, Kaatje
Danieli, Giorgia
Duarte-Salles, Talita
Glismann, Steffen
Huerta, Consuelo
de Lusignan, Simon
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by_nc_nd
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Accelerated Development of VAccine beNefit-risk Collaboration in Europe (ADVANCE) is a public-private collaboration aiming to develop and test a system for rapid benefit-risk (B/R) monitoring of vaccines, using existing healthcare databases in Europe. The objective of this paper was to assess the feasibility of using electronic healthcare databases to estimate dose-specific acellular pertussis (aP) and whole cell pertussis (wP) vaccine coverage. METHODS: Seven electronic healthcare databases in four European countries (Denmark (n = 2), UK (n = 2), Spain (n = 2) and Italy (n = 1)) participated in this study. Children were included from birth and followed up to age six years. Vaccination exposure was obtained from the databases and classified by type (aP or wP), and dose 1, 2 or 3. Coverage was estimated using period prevalence. For the 2006 birth cohort, two estimation methods for pertussis vaccine coverage, period prevalence and cumulative incidence were compared for each database. RESULTS: The majority of the 2,575,576 children included had been vaccinated at the country-specific recommended ages. Overall, the estimated dose 3 coverage was 88-97% in Denmark (birth cohorts from 2003 to 2014), 96-100% in the UK (2003-2014), 95-98% in Spain (2004-2014) and 94% in Italy (2006-2007). The estimated dose 3 coverage per birth cohort in Denmark and the UK differed by 1-6% compared with national estimates, with our estimates mostly higher. The estimated dose 3 coverage in Spain differed by 0-2% with no consistent over- or underestimation. In Italy, the estimates were 3% lower compared with the national estimates. Except for Italy, for which the two coverage estimation methods generated the same results, the estimated cumulative incidence coverages were consistently 1-10% lower than period prevalence estimates. CONCLUSION: This study showed that it was possible to provide consistent estimates of pertussis immunisation coverage from the electronic healthcare databases included, and that the estimates were comparable with the national estimates.
Keywords
Acellular pertussis vaccination, Benchmarking, Database characteristics, Proof-of-concept study, Vaccination coverage estimation, Whole cell pertussis vaccination, Molecular Medicine, General Immunology and Microbiology, General Veterinary, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases
Citation
Emborg, H-D, Kahlert, J, Braeye, T, Bauwens, J, Bollaerts, K, Danieli, G, Duarte-Salles, T, Glismann, S, Huerta, C, de Lusignan, S, Martin, E, McGee, C, Correa, A, Tramontan, L, Weibel, D & Sturkenboom, M 2020, 'ADVANCE system testing : Can coverage of pertussis vaccination be estimated in European countries using electronic healthcare databases: An example', Vaccine, vol. 38 Suppl 2, no. 2, pp. B22-B30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.039