From Neurolaw to Neurorights: The Impact of Neuroscience on Dutch Criminal Justice and Considerations about the Future

Publication date

2026-01-27

Authors

van de Pol, NaomiORCID 0000-0003-4223-5388ISNI 0000000512624678
Meynen, G.ORCID 0000-0001-7298-8407ISNI 0000000108663755
Ligthart, SjorsISNI 0000000506807849

Editors

Wishart, Hannah
Berryessa, Colleen

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book

License

taverne

Abstract

Neuroscience and neurotechnology have contributed to criminal justice, both in practice and in research. Neurolaw is the academic field that studies the meaning and impact of neuroscience on the law and legal practices. Three neurolaw domains can be distinguished: revision, assessment, and intervention. The first part of this chapter considers these three areas with a focus on actual impact in the Netherlands. The second part of the chapter looks at the future in which neurotechnology in criminal justice can present both risks and opportunities for convicted persons’ human rights. This chapter does so in light of the current debate on so-called ‘neurorights’, which, it has been argued, may be required to ensure that rights protect people against potential risks and support opportunities presented by emerging neurotechnologies. In particular, this chapter focuses on the right to mental self-determination.

Keywords

Taverne, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Citation

van de Pol, N, Meynen, G & Ligthart, S 2026, From Neurolaw to Neurorights: The Impact of Neuroscience on Dutch Criminal Justice and Considerations about the Future. in H Wishart & C Berryessa (eds), Neuroscience in Criminal Justice Systems : The Positive Impact of Neurojustice. Routledge Contemporary Issues in Criminal Justice and Procedure, Routledge, pp. 62-77. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003510246-5