Differences between the last two glacial maxima and implications for ice-sheet, δ18O, and sea-level reconstructions
Publication date
2017-11-15
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Studies of past glacial cycles yield critical information about climate and sea-level (ice-volume) variability, including the sensitivity of climate to radiative change, and impacts of crustal rebound on sea-level reconstructions for past interglacials. Here we identify significant differences between the last and penultimate glacial maxima (LGM and PGM) in terms of global volume and distribution of land ice, despite similar temperatures and radiative forcing. Our analysis challenges conventional views of relationships between global ice volume, sea level, seawater oxygen isotope values, and deep-sea temperature, and supports the potential presence of large floating Arctic ice shelves during the PGM. The existence of different glacial ‘modes’ calls for focussed research on the complex processes behind ice-age development. We present a glacioisostatic assessment to demonstrate how a different PGM ice-sheet configuration might affect sea-level estimates for the last interglacial. Results suggest that this may alter existing last interglacial sea-level estimates, which often use an LGM-like ice configuration, by several metres (likely upward).
Keywords
Arctic ice shelf, Glacioisostatic adjustment, Ice volume, Last Glacial Maximum, Last Interglacial, Penultimate Glacial Maximum, Sea level, δO, Taverne, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Archaeology, Archaeology, Geology, SDG 13 - Climate Action
Citation
Rohling, E J, Hibbert, F D, Williams, F H, Grant, K M, Marino, G, Foster, G L, Hennekam, R, de Lange, G J, Roberts, A P, Yu, J, Webster, J M & Yokoyama, Y 2017, 'Differences between the last two glacial maxima and implications for ice-sheet, δ 18 O, and sea-level reconstructions', Quaternary Science Reviews, vol. 176, pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.09.009