Sparing the surgical area with stereotactic body radiotherapy for combined treatment of spinal metastases: a treatment planning study

Publication date

2019-02

Authors

Versteeg, Anne L.
Hes, J
van der Velden, JM
Eppinga, Wietse S CISNI 0000000389239685
Kasperts, NISNI 0000000388312609
Verkooijen, Helena M.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-1623
van Vulpen, M.ISNI 0000000397109354
Oner, F CumhurORCID 0000-0003-0858-8243ISNI 0000000395222644
Seravalli, EnricaORCID 0000-0001-5983-2256ISNI 0000000047208248
Verlaan, Jorrit JanORCID 0000-0001-8105-6660ISNI 0000000392776086

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Decreasing the radiation dose in the surgical area is important to lower the risk of wound complications when surgery and radiotherapy are combined for the treatment of spinal metastases. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose in the surgical area for spinal metastases between single fraction external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), single fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and single fraction SBRT with active sparing (SBRT-AS) of the posterior surgical area. METHODS: Radiotherapy treatment plans for EBRT, SBRT and SBRT-AS of the posterior surgical area were created for 13 patients with spinal metastases. A single fraction of 8Gy was prescribed to the spinal metastasis in the EBRT plan. For the SBRT treatment plans, a single fraction of 18Gy was prescribed to the metastasis and 8Gy to the rest of the vertebral body. For the SBRT plan with active sparing the dose in the designated surgical area was minimized without compromising the dose to the organs at risk. RESULTS: The median dose in the surgical area was 2.6Gy (1.6-5.3Gy) in the SBRT plan with active sparing of the surgical area compared to a median dose of 3.7Gy (1.6-6.3Gy) in the SBRT plan without sparing and 6.5Gy (3.5-9.1Gy) in the EBRT plans (p < .001). The radiation doses to the spinal metastases and organs at risk were not significantly different between the SBRT plan with and without sparing the surgical area. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation dose to the surgical area is significantly decreased with the use of SBRT compared to EBRT. Active sparing of the surgical area further decreased the mean radiation dose in the surgical area without compromising the dose to the spinal metastasis and the organs at risk.

Keywords

Cohort Studies, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Organ Sparing Treatments/methods, Organs at Risk/pathology, Radiosurgery/methods, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods, Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methods, Spinal Neoplasms/pathology, Spine/pathology, Tumor Burden, Clinical Trial, Phase I, Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article

Citation

Versteeg, A L, Hes, J, van der Velden, J M, Eppinga, W, Kasperts, N, Verkooijen, H M, van Vulpen, M, Oner, F C, Seravalli, E & Verlaan, J J 2019, 'Sparing the surgical area with stereotactic body radiotherapy for combined treatment of spinal metastases : a treatment planning study', Acta Oncologica, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2018.1539240