Test‐ or judgement‐based school track recommendations: Equal opportunities for students with different socio‐economic backgrounds?

Publication date

2021

Authors

van Leest, AnneISNI 000000049285992X
Hornstra, LisetteORCID 0000-0001-5873-7409ISNI 0000000419556412
van Tartwijk, J.W.F.ORCID 0000-0001-6804-4163ISNI 000000039699286X
van de Pol, JannekeISNI 0000000394381133

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

Background There are concerns that school track recommendations that are mostly based on teachers’ judgements of students’ performance (‘judgement-based recommendations’) are more biased by students’ SES than school track recommendations that are mostly based on standardized test results (‘test-based recommendations’). A recent policy reform of the Dutch educational system has provided us the unique opportunity to compare the effects of students’ SES on these two types of track recommendations. Aims The aim of this study was to examine the differences between test-based and judgement-based recommendations regarding the direct and indirect effect of students’ SES at student level and school level. Sample The sample consisted of 8,639 grade 6 students from 105 Dutch primary schools. Methods Data were analysed using two-level multilevel mediation models. Results Track recommendations were higher for high-SES students. This was mostly due to differences in students’ prior performance. SES also had a small, direct effect on judgement-based, but not on test-based recommendations. The effects were partly situated at school level. Conclusion Overall, the results indicated that teachers based their track recommendations mostly on students’ prior performance without being biased by students’ SES.

Keywords

SDG 4 - Quality Education

Citation

van Leest, A M C, Hornstra, T E, van Tartwijk, J W F & van de Pol, J E 2021, 'Test‐ or judgement‐based school track recommendations : Equal opportunities for students with different socio‐economic backgrounds?', British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 193-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12356