Opportunities and methodological challenges in EEG and MEG resting state functional brain network research

Publication date

2015-08

Authors

van Diessen, E
Numan, T
van Dellen, E
van der Kooi, A W
Boersma, MISNI 0000000419808085
Hofman, DennisISNI 0000000388027306
van Lutterveld, R
van Dijk, B W
van Straaten, E C W
Hillebrand, A

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetoencephalogram (MEG) recordings during resting state are increasingly used to study functional connectivity and network topology. Moreover, the number of different analysis approaches is expanding along with the rising interest in this research area. The comparison between studies can therefore be challenging and discussion is needed to underscore methodological opportunities and pitfalls in functional connectivity and network studies. In this overview we discuss methodological considerations throughout the analysis pipeline of recording and analyzing resting state EEG and MEG data, with a focus on functional connectivity and network analysis. We summarize current common practices with their advantages and disadvantages; provide practical tips, and suggestions for future research. Finally, we discuss how methodological choices in resting state research can affect the construction of functional networks. When taking advantage of current best practices and avoid the most obvious pitfalls, functional connectivity and network studies can be improved and enable a more accurate interpretation and comparison between studies.

Keywords

Resting state, EEG, MEG, Functional connectivity, Functional networks, Graph analysis, Minimum spanning tree, Taverne

Citation

van Diessen, E, Numan, T, van Dellen, E, van der Kooi, A W, Boersma, M, Hofman, D, van Lutterveld, R, van Dijk, B W, van Straaten, E C W, Hillebrand, A & Stam, C J 2015, 'Opportunities and methodological challenges in EEG and MEG resting state functional brain network research', Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 126, no. 8, pp. 1468-1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.11.018