Towards mid-position based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy using online magnetic resonance imaging guidance for central lung tumours

Publication date

2022-07

Authors

Ligtenberg, Hans
Hackett, S L
Merckel, LG
Snoeren, Louk
Kontaxis, Charis
Zachiu, Cornel
Bol, G HORCID 0000-0002-7393-167XISNI 0000000392489626
Verhoeff, JoostORCID 0000-0001-9673-0793ISNI 0000000393929005
Fast, MartinORCID 0000-0001-9107-4627

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

Background and purpose: Central lung tumours can be treated by magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy. Complications might be reduced by decreasing the Planning Target Volume (PTV) using mid-position (midP)-based planning instead of Internal Target Volume (ITV)-based planning. In this study, we aimed to verify a method to automatically derive patient-specific PTV margins for midP-based planning, and show dosimetric robustness of midP-based planning for a 1.5T MR-linac. Materials and methods: Central(n = 12) and peripheral(n = 4) central lung tumour cases who received 8x7.5 Gy were included. A midP-image was reconstructed from ten phases of the 4D-Computed Tomography using deformable image registration. The Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) was delineated on the midP-image and the PTV margin was automatically calculated based on van Herk's margin recipe, treating the standard deviation of all Deformation Vector Fields, within the GTV, as random error component. Dosimetric robustness of midP-based planning for MR-linac using automatically derived margins was verified by 4D dose-accumulation. MidP-based plans were compared to ITV-based plans. Automatically derived margins were verified with manually derived margins. Results: The mean D95% target coverage in GTV + 2 mm was 59.9 Gy and 62.0 Gy for midP- and ITV-based central lung plans, respectively. The mean lung dose was significantly lower for midP-based treatment plans (difference:-0.3 Gy; p<0.042). Automatically derived margins agreed within one millimeter with manually derived margins. Conclusions: This retrospective study indicates that mid-position-based treatment plans for central lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy yield lower OAR doses compared to ITV-based treatment plans on the MR-linac. Patient-specific GTV-to-PTV margins can be derived automatically and result in clinically acceptable target coverage.

Keywords

Dose accumulation, Mid-position planning, MR-Linac, MRgRT, NSCLC, Radiation, Oncology, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Journal Article

Citation

Ligtenberg, H, Hackett, S L, Merckel, L G, Snoeren, L, Kontaxis, C, Zachiu, C, Bol, G H, Verhoeff, J J C & Fast, M F 2022, 'Towards mid-position based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy using online magnetic resonance imaging guidance for central lung tumours', Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology, vol. 23, pp. 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.05.002