Cytokeratin 19 expression in early oral squamous cell carcinoma and their metastasis: Inadequate biomarker for one-step nucleic acid amplification implementation in sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure

Publication date

2017-09

Authors

Noorlag, R.
van Es, Robert J JISNI 0000000396355924
de Bree, RemcoORCID 0000-0001-7128-5814ISNI 0000000387040744
Willems, S. M.ISNI 0000000387897385

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative analysis of lymph nodes during a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure could result in one-step surgery for early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with an occult nodal metastasis. One-step nucleic acid amplification rapidly detects cytokeratin 19 (CK19) RNA with high accuracy. Sensitivity and specificity of CK19 expression in OSCC was evaluated. METHODS: Immunohistochemical CK19 expression was done in 207 patients with OSCC with 65 cases of paired nodal metastases. RESULTS: CK19 was expressed in 65% of all OSCC and even less in early OSCC (56%), with poor correlation between primary tumor and (occult) nodal metastasis. Furthermore, ectopic glandular tissue in close proximity of lymph nodes showed strong CK19 expression. CONCLUSION: CK19 lacks both sensitivity and specificity as a biomarker for nodal metastasis in OSCC, which questions the suitability for CK19-based one-step nucleic acid amplification in SLNB procedures. Therefore, future studies should focus on other biomarkers, because the concept of fast intraoperative diagnostics during SLNB remains attractive.

Keywords

cytokeratin 19, one-step nucleic acid amplification, oral cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), Taverne, Journal Article

Citation

Noorlag, R, van Es, R J J, de Bree, R & Willems, S M 2017, 'Cytokeratin 19 expression in early oral squamous cell carcinoma and their metastasis : Inadequate biomarker for one-step nucleic acid amplification implementation in sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure', Head & neck, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1864-1868. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24847