Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Nonrandomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter Phase I/II Study
Publication date
2025-03-20
Authors
Bhatia, Shailender
Topalian, Suzanne L
Sharfman, William
Meyer, Tim
Steven, Neil
Lao, Christopher D
Fariñas-Madrid, Lorena
Devriese, Lot A
Moore, Kathleen
Ferris, Robert L
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by_nc_nd
Abstract
PURPOSE: Approximately 50% of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have primary or acquired resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade, which may be overcome using combination immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody. We present results from the recurrent/metastatic MCC cohort in CheckMate 358, a nonrandomized, multicohort, phase I/II study of nivolumab (NIVO) with or without ipilimumab (IPI) in virus-associated cancers (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02488759). METHODS: ICI-naïve patients with recurrent/metastatic MCC and 0-2 previous systemic therapies were administered NIVO monotherapy at 240 mg once every 2 weeks or combination therapy with NIVO 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks + IPI 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks. The primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients received NIVO (n = 25) or NIVO + IPI (n = 43). The objective response rate (95% CI) and median DOR (95% CI), respectively, were 60% (38.7 to 78.9) and 60.6 months (16.7 to not applicable [NA]) with NIVO and 58% (42.1 to 73) and 25.9 months (10.4 to NA) with NIVO + IPI. The median PFS (95% CI) and OS (95% CI), respectively, were 21.3 (9.2 to 62.5) and 80.7 (23.3 to NA) months with NIVO and 8.4 (3.7 to 24.3) and 29.8 (8.5 to 48.3) months with NIVO + IPI. The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events was 28% with NIVO and 47% with the combination. CONCLUSION: This nonrandomized study showed frequent and durable responses with both NIVO and NIVO + IPI in patients with ICI-naïve advanced MCC. However, it did not show improvement in efficacy with the combination, thus contradicting previous study reports that had suggested clinical benefit with combination ICI. A randomized trial of NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy is warranted.
Keywords
Oncology, Cancer Research, Journal Article
Citation
Bhatia, S, Topalian, S L, Sharfman, W, Meyer, T, Steven, N, Lao, C D, Fariñas-Madrid, L, Devriese, L A, Moore, K, Ferris, R L, Honma, Y, Elias, I, Srirangam, A, Garnett-Benson, C, Lee, M & Nghiem, P 2025, 'Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma : A Nonrandomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter Phase I/II Study', Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1137-1147. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02138