‘Er Is Geen Recht Voor Ons...’: Van Hogendorps abolitionistische toneelstuk Kraspoekol (1800) als proces tegen de slavernij”

Publication date

2016

Authors

Adams, SarahISNI 0000000512676208
van der Haven, Kornee

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

‘There is no justice for us…’: Van Hogendorp’s abolitionist play Kraspoekol (1800) as a trial against slavery Theatre plays in which social abuses are criticised often display striking parallels to the civic court. Both in trials and theatre performances the complaining party is positioned against someone who defends the accused person or issue, each propagating different viewpoints towards a case, whereupon a judge has to decide on the matter. In the early modern era, plays served as experimental sites to conduct (fictional) cases. When the theatre curtain comes down, the audience is incited to express its opinion on the case that was staged. The case that takes central stage in this article is the accusation of Dutch colonial slavery in Dirk van Hogendorp’s antislavery drama Kraspoekol, of de slaaverny (1800). This play was highly controversial and its performance in The Hague caused great tumult. Drawing on studies of early modern and contemporary theatre, this contribution will examine the interlace of Kraspoekol and legal practice by looking at accusations (by slaves and abolitionist characters) and defences (by slave master Kraspoekol). The article addresses how the combination of showing and phrasing injustice might encourage Kraspoekol’s audience to ascribe itself the role by the judge and to condemn not only the wrongful treatment of the characters of Kraspoekol, but the entire slavery institution.

Keywords

Enlightenment, theatre, slavery, law and literature, Dirk van Hogendorp

Citation

Adams, S & van der Haven, K 2016, '‘Er Is Geen Recht Voor Ons...’: Van Hogendorps abolitionistische toneelstuk Kraspoekol (1800) als proces tegen de slavernij”', Internationale Neerlandistiek, vol. 54 , no. 1, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5117/IN2016.1.ADAM