The Legal Power of Highest Possible Ambition: Setting Legal and Scientific Indicators to Assess Highest Possible Ambition under Article 4(3) of the Paris Agreement

Publication date

2025

Authors

Voigt, Christina
Sauter, Philipp
Teixeira, Rita GuerreiroORCID 0000-0002-9013-9203
Rogelj, Joeri
Schleussner, Carl Friedrich
Sulyok, Katalin

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

The Paris Agreement requires each state party to submit a nationally determined contribution (ndc) every five years. Current ndcs fall short of limiting global warming to 1.5°C, making the 2025 submissions crucial. Against commonly held belief, the level of climate change mitigation ambition in ndcs does not entirely lie within the discretion of Parties. Article 4(3) of the Paris Agreement requires that each party’s successive ndc will reflect its ‘highest possible ambition’ (hpa); an important normative requirement crucial for raising mitigation ambition. This article examines hpa and provides legal and scientific indicators for assessing whether parties’ 2025 ndcs and subsequent submissions align with the hpa requirement in Article 4(3). In doing so, a comprehensive framework essential for ensuring that ndcs are ambitious, credible, and effective in reducing emissions and mitigating climate impacts is offered. The success of the global effort against climate change depends on parties reflecting their hpa in ndcs and implementing effective mitigation measures, highlighting the urgency of hpa in each party’s climate efforts.

Keywords

climate change, due diligence, highest possible ambition, law and science, mitigation, Paris Agreement, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Law, SDG 13 - Climate Action

Citation

Voigt, C, Sauter, P, Teixeira, R G, Rogelj, J, Schleussner, C F & Sulyok, K 2025, 'The Legal Power of Highest Possible Ambition : Setting Legal and Scientific Indicators to Assess Highest Possible Ambition under Article 4(3) of the Paris Agreement', Climate Law, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-bja10063