Historical and contemporary conceptions of trauma-related dissociation: A neo-Janetian critique of models of divided personality
Publication date
2020-05
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Both Pierre Janet and the neo-Janetian contemporary theory of structural dissociation of the personality (SDP) view dissociation as inherently pathological – trauma-related dissociation. However, since the late 19th century, other theories have viewed dissociative subsystems of the personality developing after traumatic experiences as continuous with proposed divisions of normal personality. Taking Pierre Janet's hierarchy of degrees of reality as a guide, along with the basic premises of the theory of structural dissociation of the personality, this paper examines this assumption in constructs from the late 19th through 20th centuries, including ego states, self-states, schema modes and complexes. It is concluded that the SDP concept of dissociative parts of the personality is most consistent with the historical and empirical literature, and that dissociation is best thought of as discontinuous with normal personality.
Keywords
Trauma, Dissociation, Personality subsystems, Pierre, Janet, Hierarchy of degrees of reality, Taverne
Citation
Moskowitz, A & van der Hart, O 2020, 'Historical and contemporary conceptions of trauma-related dissociation : A neo-Janetian critique of models of divided personality', European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, vol. 4, no. 2, 100101, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejtd.2019.02.004