Image Quality of Virtual Monochromatic Reconstructions of Noncontrast CT on a Dual-Source CT Scanner in Adult Patients

Publication date

2021-10

Authors

van Ommen, Fasco
Kauw, Frans
Bennink, EdwinORCID 0000-0002-3689-8532ISNI 0000000419549773
Heit, Jeremy J
Wolman, Dylan N.
Dankbaar, Jan WillemISNI 0000000392895296
de Jong, Hugo W A MORCID 0000-0002-3000-8316
Wintermark, Max

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc_nd

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives To evaluate the image quality of virtual monochromatic images (VMI) reconstructed from dual-energy dual-source noncontrast head CT with different reconstruction kernels. Materials and Methods Twenty-five consecutive adult patients underwent noncontrast dual-energy CT. VMI were retrospectively reconstructed at 5-keV increments from 40 to 140 keV using quantitative and head kernels. CT-number, noise levels (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the gray and white matter and artifacts using the posterior fossa artifact index (PFAI) were evaluated. Results CT-number increased with decreasing VMI energy levels, and SD was lowest at 85 keV. SNR was maximized at 80 keV and 85 keV for the head and quantitative kernels, respectively. CNR was maximum at 40 keV; PFAI was lowest at 90 (head kernel) and 100 (quantitative kernel) keV. Optimal VMI image quality was significantly better than conventional CT. Conclusion Optimal image quality of VMI energies can improve brain parenchymal image quality compared to conventional CT but are reconstruction kernel dependent and depend on indication for performing noncontrast CT.

Keywords

Dual-energy CT, Dual-source CT, Image quality, Virtual monochromatic images, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Citation

van Ommen, F, Kauw, F, Bennink, E, Heit, J J, Wolman, D N, Dankbaar, J W, de Jong, H W A M & Wintermark, M 2021, 'Image Quality of Virtual Monochromatic Reconstructions of Noncontrast CT on a Dual-Source CT Scanner in Adult Patients', Academic Radiology, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. e323-e330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.038