Why Halley did not discover proper motion and why Cassini did

Publication date

2019-08-29

Authors

Verbunt, FrankISNI 0000000397004763
Van Der Sluys, M.ORCID 0000-0003-1231-0762ISNI 0000000393813352

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/workingpaper/preprint
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

In 1717 Halley compared contemporaneous measurements of the latitudes of four stars with earlier measurements by ancient Greek astronomers and by Brahe, and from the differences concluded that these four stars showed proper motion. An analysis with modern methods shows that the data used by Halley do not contain significant evidence for proper motion. What Halley found are the measurement errors of Ptolemaios and Brahe. Halley further argued that the occultation of Aldebaran by the Moon on 11 March 509 in Athens confirmed the change in latitude of Aldebaran. In fact, however, the relevant observation was almost certainly made in Alexandria where Aldebaran was not occulted. By carefully considering measurement errors Jacques Cassini showed that Halley's results from comparison with earlier astronomers were spurious, a conclusion partially confirmed by various later authors. Cassini's careful study of the measurements of the latitude of Arcturus provides the first significant evidence for proper motion.

Keywords

Physics - History and Philosophy of Physics, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Citation

Verbunt, F & van der Sluys, M 2019 'Why Halley did not discover proper motion and why Cassini did' arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.13636