Closing the 2020 emissions gap: issues, options and strategies
Publication date
2012-08-03
Authors
Hare, B.
Schaeffer, M.
Rocha, M.
Rogelj, J.
Höhne, N.
Blok, K.
Leun, K. van der
Harrison, N.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Report
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Without further and accelerated action it appears very likely that global greenhouse gas emission
levels in 2020 will be far above those that are consistent with agreed international warming goals.
This gap between where emissions are headed and where they need to be is now widely
acknowledged by the international community and at COP17 in Durban a work plan on enhancing
mitigation ambition was launched to explore options for strengthening efforts by all Parties.
In this context, this briefing paper explores a range of issues, options and strategies for bridging the
2020 emissions gap as a matter of urgency. We begin by reviewing some of the recent science in
relation to limiting warming to the agreed warming goals, and the relative role of different
greenhouse gases and other climate forcing agents. The scientific analysis in this paper is new in that
it integrates insights from the recent reports published by the United Nations Environment
Programme, relating to hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions, action on methane and action to reduce
air pollution in the context of efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to levels consistent with
holding warming to below 2°C, and ultimately to 1.5°C .
Another innovative feature of this briefing paper then follows with a practical analysis of a range of
initiatives that, taken together, could have the potential to bring emissions from present projected
levels to those that are consistent with 2°C warming limit and assist national governments to
implement and strengthen their emission reduction pledges. We provide an overview of such
initiatives -often led by players other than national governments and in many cases driven by
concerns broader than climate change. Together, these initiatives could have the potential to bridge
the emissions gap.
Finally we highlight further work needed to elaborate on the scientific issues, mitigation options and
barriers to their achievement in order to realise the possibilities outlined in the paper.