Intercomparison of Different Energy Prediction Methods Within the European Project "Performance" - Results of the 1st Round Robin
Publication date
2007-09-03
Editors
Willeke, G.
Ossenbrink, H.
Helm, P.
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Eight separate energy prediction methods, developed independently across European Universities and Research Centres, have been compared with respect to their estimated DC energy generation for five different photovoltaic (PV) module technologies and 7 different sites distributed over whole Europe. The analysis of this work is the basis for further improvements of each of the modelling approaches and thus enables a reduction of the prediction error in PV yield estimations. The recently completed first of three planned round-robin inter-comparisons found that the agreement for all methods and all technologies is within ±5% on an annual basis, provided that the environmental parameters incident irradiance and the module temperature are well described. This good accuracy was also found when translating the energy yield measured at one location in Europe to another for an identical module utilising shorter time periods (months). Significantly higher errors were found when using different PV modules of the same manufacturer and technology to predict the energy yield at other sites. Here the variation in module power rating dominated the results of the energy prediction methods and a correction for these differences had to be applied
Keywords
Taverne, SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
Citation
Friesen, G, Gottschalg, R, Beyer, H G, Williams, S R, van Sark, W G J H M, Guérin de Montgareuil, A, van der Borg, N, Huld, T, Müller, B, de Keizer, A C & Niu, Y 2007, Intercomparison of Different Energy Prediction Methods Within the European Project "Performance" - Results of the 1st Round Robin. in G Willeke, H Ossenbrink & P Helm (eds), 22nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference. WIP-Renewable Energies, [München], pp. 2659-2663.