Communication, advice exchange and job satisfaction of nursing staff: a social network analyses of 35 long-term care units.
Publication date
2011
Authors
Beek, A.P.A van
Wagner, C.
Spreeuwenberg, P.
Frijters, D.H.M.
Ribbe, M.W.
Groenewegen, P.P.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
(c) UU Universiteit Utrecht, 2011
Abstract
Background: The behaviour of individuals is affected by the social networks in which they are embedded.
Networks are also important for the diffusion of information and the influence of employees in organisations. Yet,
at the moment little is known about the social networks of nursing staff in healthcare settings. This is the first
study that investigates informal communication and advice networks of nursing staff in long-term care. We
examine the structure of the networks, how they are related to the size of units and characteristics of nursing staff,
and their relationship with job satisfaction.
Methods: We collected social network data of 380 nursing staff of 35 units in group projects and psychogeriatric
units in nursing homes and residential homes in the Netherlands. Communication and advice networks were
analyzed in a social network application (UCINET), focusing on the number of contacts (density) between nursing
staff on the units. We then studied the correlation between the density of networks, size of the units and
characteristics of nursing staff. We used multilevel analyses to investigate the relationship between social networks
and job satisfaction of nursing staff, taking characteristics of units and nursing staff into account.
Results: Both communication and advice networks were negatively related to the number of residents and the
number of nursing staff of the units. Communication and advice networks were more dense when more staff
worked part-time. Furthermore, density of communication networks was positively related to the age of nursing
staff of the units. Multilevel analyses showed that job satisfaction differed significantly between individual staff
members and units and was influenced by the number of nursing staff of the units. However, this relationship
disappeared when density of communication networks was added to the model.
Conclusions: Overall, communication and advice networks of nursing staff in long-term care are relatively dense.
This fits with the high level of cooperation that is needed to provide good care to residents. Social networks are
more dense in small units and are also shaped by characteristics of staff members. The results furthermore show
that communication networks are important for staff’s job satisfaction.