Improved proteolytic stability of chicken cathelicidin-2 derived peptides by d-amino acid substitutions and cyclization

Files

Access status: Embargo until 2050-01-01 , molhoek1 et al 2011.pdf (449.58 KB)

Publication date

2011

Authors

Molhoek, E.M.
van Dijk, A.ISNI 0000000395107929
Veldhuizen, EdwinISNI 0000000393386442
Haagsman, Henk PISNI 0000000395332181
Bikker, F.J.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

License

Abstract

A truncated version of host defense peptide chicken cathelicidin-2, C1-15, possesses potent, broad spectrum antibacterial activity. A variant of this peptide, F2,5,12W, which contains 3 phenylalanine to tryptophan substitutions, possesses improved antibacterial activity and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) neutralizing activity compared to C1-15. In order to improve the proteolytic resistance of both peptides we engineered novel chicken cathelicidin-2 analogs by substitution of l- with d-amino acids and head-to-tail cyclization. Both cyclic and d-amino acid variants showed enhanced stability in human serum compared to C1-15 and F2,5,12W. The d-amino acid variants were fully resistant to proteolysis by trypsin and bacterial proteases. Head-to-tail cyclization of peptide F2,5,12Wresulted in a 3.5-fold lower cytotoxicity toward peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In general, these modifications did not influence antibacterial and LPS neutralization activities. It is concluded that for the development of novel therapeutic compounds based on chicken cathelicidin-2 d-amino acid substitutions and cyclization must be considered. These modifications increase the stability and lower cytotoxicity of the peptides without altering their antimicrobial potency.

Keywords

Host defense peptide, Chicken cathelicidin-2, Stability, d-Amino acid substitution, Cyclization

Citation

Molhoek, E M, van Dijk, A, Veldhuizen, E J A, Haagsman, H P & Bikker, F J 2011, 'Improved proteolytic stability of chicken cathelicidin-2 derived peptides by d-amino acid substitutions and cyclization', Peptides, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 875-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2011.02.017