Integrating field sampling, spatial statistics and remote sensing to map wetland vegetation in the Pantanal, Brazil
Publication date
2010
Authors
Arieira, J.
Karssenberg, D.J.
Jong, S.M. de
Addink, E.A.
Couto, E.
Cunha, C. Nunes da
Skøien, J.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
Wetland ecosystems are among the habitats most threatened by climatic change, due
to their high sensitivity to the hydrological regime (Junk, 2002). They form transitional
habitats between aquatic and terrestrial systems and embody different kinds of habitats
such as mangroves, peatlands, freshwater swamps and marshes (Mitsch et al., 2009).
The ecological importance of these habitats has been recognized worldwide as well
10 as the urgent need to preserve them, as stressed in the Cuiaba´ Declaration on Wetland
elaborated during the 8 International Wetlands Conference of INTECOL, Brazil.
However, lack of knowledge about the complex natural dynamics of wetlands may lead
to arbitrary management decisions (Junk et al. 2006). To improve the protection of
wetlands, it is imperative to have a thorough understanding of the structuring elements
15 and of the identification of efficient methods to describe and monitor them.
Vegetation communities have distinct spatial and temporal patterns. Understanding
the mechanisms that determine these patterns has been an important issue in ecology
for decades (e.g., Connell and Slatyer, 1977; Svenning et al., 2004). Two factors
play a key role: spatial interactions in ecological processes (e.g. competition), and
20 environmental factors (e.g. flooding duration) (Tilman, 1988). Ecological processes
include interactions between individuals, which may cause particular spatial patterns
in the distribution of plants. Spatial variation in environmental factors causes spatial
patterns in vegetation communities due to the differences of species requirements.
These two factors do not usually operate independently but act together at different
25 spatio-temporal scales (Turner, 1989; Svenning et al., 2004). This multi-scale interaction
may lead to complex spatial patterns that are continuously changing (Wagner and
Fortin, 2005).