Outpatient and Ambulatory Extended Recovery Robotic Hepatectomy: Multinational Study of 307 Cases
Publication date
2024-07-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For open minor hepatectomy, morbidity and recovery are dominated by the incision. The robotic approach may transform this "incision dominant procedure" into a safe outpatient procedure. STUDY DESIGN: We audited outpatient (less than 2 midnights) robotic hepatectomy at 6 hepatobiliary centers in 2 nations to test the hypothesis that the robotic approach can be a safe and effective short-stay procedure. Establishing early recovery after surgery programs were active at all sites, and home digital monitoring was available at 1 of the institutions. RESULTS: A total of 307 outpatient (26 same-day and 281 next-day discharge) robotic hepatectomies were identified (2013 to 2023). Most were minor hepatectomies (194 single segments, 90 bi-segmentectomies, 14 three segments, and 8 four segments). Thirty-nine (13%) were for benign histology, whereas 268 were for cancer (33 hepatocellular carcinoma, 27 biliary, and 208 metastatic disease). Patient characteristics were a median age of 60 years (18 to 93 years), 55% male, and a median BMI of 26 kg/m 2 (14 to 63 kg/m 2 ). Thirty (10%) patients had cirrhosis. One hundred eighty-seven (61%) had previous abdominal operation. Median operative time was 163 minutes (30 to 433 minutes), with a median blood loss of 50 mL (10 to 900 mL). There were no deaths and 6 complications (2%): 2 wound infections, 1 failure to thrive, and 3 perihepatic abscesses. Readmission was required in 5 (1.6%) patients. Of the 268 malignancy cases, 25 (9%) were R1 resections. Of the 128 with superior segment resections (segments 7, 8, 4A, 2, and 1), there were 12 positive margins (9%) and 2 readmissions for abscess. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient robotic hepatectomy in well-selected cases is safe (0 mortality, 2% complication, and 1.6% readmission), including resection in the superior or posterior portions of the liver that is challenging with nonarticulating laparoscopic instruments.
Keywords
Humans, Hepatectomy/methods, Middle Aged, Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods, Male, Female, Aged, Adult, Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods, Aged, 80 and over, Adolescent, Young Adult, Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data, Treatment Outcome, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Liver Neoplasms/surgery, Retrospective Studies, Taverne, General Medicine, Journal Article, Multicenter Study
Citation
Park, J O, Lafaro, K, Hagendoorn, J, Melstrom, L, Gerhards, M F, Görgec, B, Marsman, H A, Thornblade, L W, Pilz da Cunha, G, Yang, F F, Labadie, K P, Sham, J G, Swijnenburg, R J, He, J & Fong, Y 2024, 'Outpatient and Ambulatory Extended Recovery Robotic Hepatectomy : Multinational Study of 307 Cases', Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 239, no. 1, pp. 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001107