Tailored Flood Risk Communication: Residents’ Perspectives as Starting Point

Publication date

2024-12

Authors

Snel, Karin A. W.ORCID 0000-0002-5287-942XISNI 0000000492859786
Priest, Sally
Hartmann, ThomasISNI 0000000378547930
Witte, PatrickISNI 0000000408806578
Geertman, S. C.M.ORCID 0000-0002-8824-0484ISNI 0000000039413620

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Flood risk is increasing, and residents are expected to undertake adaptation measures to minimize flood damage. This requires them to be aware of the risk they face and how they can adapt, but this is often not the case. Through risk communication, residents’ relation to their flood-prone environment could be strengthened, but the effect remains limited. This article aims to understand how residents across countries prefer flood risk communication and provides a basis for developing communication strategies that manage to raise awareness on risk and adaptation. Residents living in flood risk areas in England and the Netherlands were interviewed on their preferences for flood risk communication. The Q-methodology, consisting of 34 Q-sorts, resulted in four significantly different sets of preferences: (1) localist; (2) sufficientist; (3) imperfectionist; and (4) conventionalist. Moreover, cultural and individual factors, such as country of residence, flood experience, and responsibility division, prove potential determiners for these distinctly different perspectives.

Keywords

England, Q-methodology, Flood risk communication, Flood risk management, Methodology, Residents' perspectives, the Netherlands

Citation

Snel, K A W, Priest, S, Hartmann, T, Witte, P A & Geertman, S C M 2024, 'Tailored Flood Risk Communication : Residents’ Perspectives as Starting Point', Nature and Culture, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 297-327. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2024.190304