Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests for people with suspected COVID-19 in the community
Publication date
2022-05
Authors
Stohr, Joep J.J.M.
Zwart, Vivian F.
Goderski, Gabriel
Meijer, Adam
Nagel-Imming, Carla R.S.
Kluytmans-Van Den Bergh, M
Pas, Suzan D.
van den Oetelaar, Femke
Hellwich, Marloes
Gan, Kim H.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the performance of nasal mid-turbinate self-testing using rapid antigen detection tests (RDT) for persons with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the community. Self-testing for COVID-19 infection with lateral flow assay severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RDT, provides rapid results and could enable frequent and extensive testing in the community, thereby improving the control of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: Participants visiting a municipal SARS-CoV-2 testing centre, received self-testing kits containing either the BD Veritor System (BD-RDT) or Roche SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test (Roche-RDT). Oro-nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from the participants for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) testing. As a proxy for contagiousness, viral culture was performed on a selection of qRT-PCR positive samples to determine the Ct-value at which the chance of a positive culture dropped below 0.5 (Ct-value cut-off). Sensitivity and specificity of self-testing were compared to qRT-PCR with a Ct-value below the Ct value cut-off. Determinants independently associated with a false-negative self-test result were determined. Results: A total of 3201 participants were included (BD-RDT n = 1595; Roche-RDT n = 1606). Sensitivity and specificity of self-testing compared with the qRT-PCR results with a Ct-value below the Ct-value cut-off were 78.4% (95% CI 73.2%–83.5%) and 99.4% (95% CI 99.1%–99.7%), respectively. A higher age was independently associated with a false-negative self-testing result with an odds ratio of 1.024 (95% CI 1.003–1.044). Conclusions: Self-testing using currently available RDT has a high specificity and relatively high sensitivity to identify individuals with a high probability of contagiousness.
Keywords
Antigens, Viral/analysis, COVID-19 Testing, COVID-19/diagnosis, Humans, SARS-CoV-2/genetics, Self-Testing, Sensitivity and Specificity, Taverne, Journal Article
Citation
Stohr, J J J M, Zwart, V F, Goderski, G, Meijer, A, Nagel-Imming, C R S, Kluytmans-van den Bergh, M F Q, Pas, S D, van den Oetelaar, F, Hellwich, M, Gan, K H, Rietveld, A, Verweij, J J, Murk, J L, van den Bijllaardt, W & Kluytmans, J A J W 2022, 'Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests for people with suspected COVID-19 in the community', Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 695-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.07.039