How to Obtain Valid Inference under Unit Nonresponse?

Publication date

2017-12-01

Authors

Boeschoten, LauraISNI 0000000492859815
Vink, GerkoORCID 0000-0001-9767-1924ISNI 0000000394871968
Hox, JoopISNI 000000044922892X

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Weighting methods are commonly used in situations of unit nonresponse with linked register data. However, several arguments in terms of valid inference and practical usability can be made against the use of weighting methods in these situations. Imputation methods such as sample and mass imputation may be suitable alternatives, as they lead to valid inference in situations of item nonresponse and have some practical advantages. In a simulation study, sample and mass imputation were compared to traditional weighting when dealing with unit nonresponse in linked register data. Methods were compared on their bias and coverage in different scenarios. Both, sample and mass imputation, had better coverage than traditional weighting in all scenarios. Imputation methods can therefore be recommended over weighting as they also have practical advantages, such as that estimates outside the observed data distribution can be created and that many auxiliary variables can be taken into account. The use of sample or mass imputation depends on the specific data structure.

Keywords

coverage, mass imputation, sample imputation, Weighting, Statistics and Probability

Citation

Boeschoten, L, Vink, G & Hox, J J C M 2017, 'How to Obtain Valid Inference under Unit Nonresponse?', Journal of Official Statistics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 963-978. https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0045