Implicit Arguments: Event Modification or Option Type Categories?
Publication date
2012
Editors
Aloni, M.
Kimmelman, V.
Roelofsen, F.
Sassoon, G.W.
Schulz, K.
Westera, M.
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Part of book
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
We propose a unified syntactic-semantic account of passive sentences and sentences with an unspecified object (John read). For both constructions, we employ option types for introducing implicit arguments into the syntactic-semantic categorial mechanism. We show the advantages of this approach over previous proposals in the domains of scope and unaccusatives. Unlike pure syntactic treatments, option types immediately derive the obligatory narrow scope of existential quantification over an implicit argument’s slot. Unlike purely semantic, event-based treatments, our proposal naturally accounts for syntactic contrasts between passives and unaccusatives, as in the door *(was) opened by John.
Keywords
Taverne
Citation
Blom, C, de Groote, P, Winter, Y S & Zwarts, J 2012, Implicit Arguments: Event Modification or Option Type Categories? in M Aloni, V Kimmelman, F Roelofsen, G W Sassoon, K Schulz & M Westera (eds), Logic, Language and Meaning : 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam , The Netherlands, December 19-21, 2011, Revised Selected Papers. 1 edn, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7218, Springer, pp. 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_25