Implicit Arguments: Event Modification or Option Type Categories?

Publication date

2012

Authors

Blom, C.
de Groote, P.
Vinter Seggev, YoadORCID 0000-0002-7209-710XISNI 0000000117170506
Zwarts, JoostORCID 0000-0002-8892-6523ISNI 0000000048214287

Editors

Aloni, M.
Kimmelman, V.
Roelofsen, F.
Sassoon, G.W.
Schulz, K.
Westera, M.

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Part of book
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

We propose a unified syntactic-semantic account of passive sentences and sentences with an unspecified object (John read). For both constructions, we employ option types for introducing implicit arguments into the syntactic-semantic categorial mechanism. We show the advantages of this approach over previous proposals in the domains of scope and unaccusatives. Unlike pure syntactic treatments, option types immediately derive the obligatory narrow scope of existential quantification over an implicit argument’s slot. Unlike purely semantic, event-based treatments, our proposal naturally accounts for syntactic contrasts between passives and unaccusatives, as in the door *(was) opened by John.

Keywords

Taverne

Citation

Blom, C, de Groote, P, Winter, Y S & Zwarts, J 2012, Implicit Arguments: Event Modification or Option Type Categories? in M Aloni, V Kimmelman, F Roelofsen, G W Sassoon, K Schulz & M Westera (eds), Logic, Language and Meaning : 18th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam , The Netherlands, December 19-21, 2011, Revised Selected Papers. 1 edn, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7218, Springer, pp. 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_25