Treatment Trajectories in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A PIONEER+ Big Data Analysis
Publication date
2025-10
Authors
Nicoletti, Rossella
Liu, Alex Qinyang
Evans-Axelsson, Susan
Golozar, Asieh
Beyer, Katharina
Meulder, Bertrand De
Campi, Riccardo
Gacci, Mauro
Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
Steinbesser, Carl
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The treatment landscape for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is evolving rapidly. Real-world data (RWD) are essential to understand actual treatment use and outcomes. This study aimed to describe treatment trajectories and clinical outcomes in a large, multicenter RWD cohort under the PIONEER project. METHODS: Eight European and US databases (2016-2020), including electronic health records, insurance claims, primary care data, and cancer registries, were standardized to the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership Common Data Model. Patients diagnosed with mHSPC and those receiving treatment were identified. The compared and analyzed outcomes included treatment switch, symptomatic progression, adverse events, and death. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 107 438 patients with mHSPC were identified, and 67 909 received treatment. Most of the patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy (69.4%), followed by ADT + an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI; 15.2%), ADT + chemotherapy (14.0%), and triplet therapy (1.2%). The use of ARPIs increased over time. ADT + ARPI showed the highest persistence (53.8%) and a 5-yr switch-free survival rate of up to 72.3%. ADT monotherapy had 5-yr switch-free survival rates of 21.3-58.6% and adverse event-free survival rates of 64.7-81.2%. Addition of an ARPI improved switch-free survival (24.1-72.3%) but lowered adverse event-free survival (55.2-82.7%). Chemotherapy-based and triplet therapies showed variable results without consistent survival benefit. Limitations include residual confounding, inconsistent adverse event reporting, and possible data overlap. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This is the largest RWD study of systemic mHSPC treatment. Despite evidence, ADT monotherapy remains the most used first-line therapy. Increased use ADT + ARPI is associated with better persistence and improved outcomes in the real-world setting, supporting its broader adoption in clinical practice.
Keywords
Big data analysis, Metastatic prostate cancer, Prostate cancer, Real-world evidence, Journal Article
Citation
Nicoletti, R, Liu, A Q, Evans-Axelsson, S, Golozar, A, Beyer, K, Meulder, B D, Campi, R, Gacci, M, Teoh, J Y-C, Steinbesser, C, Hijazy, A, Harbachou, A, Brash, J T, Willemse, P-P M, Murtola, T, Roobol, M J, Sierra, J M, Bjartell, A, Merseburger, A S, Rajwa, P, Cornford, P, Abbott, T, Ndow, J, Rivas, J G, Davies, E, Feng, Q, Snijder, R & PIONEER + consortium 2025, 'Treatment Trajectories in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer : A PIONEER+ Big Data Analysis', European Urology Oncology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1340-1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.08.007