Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: Should we Intervene Earlier?

Publication date

2018-04-10

Authors

de Leeuw, Peter W
Postma, Cor T
Spiering, WilkoORCID 0000-0002-2493-6407
Kroon, Abraham A

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Randomized trials have failed to show clinical benefit in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis who were treated with angioplasty with or without stenting. However, these studies were done in patients with a high-grade stenosis. This paper examines whether there are arguments to consider patients with low-grade stenosis for angioplasty. RECENT FINDINGS: Patients with low-grade (< 50%) atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis have an excess risk for cardiovascular and renal complications. This could be related to inflammatory factors being generated by the stenotic kidney. Moreover, even a kidney with low-grade stenosis clears less or produces more of the natural nitric oxide inhibitor ADMA. Patients with low-grade atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis have an increased risk for a variety of complications. In addition, the abnormality is progressive. There is a case for setting up a prospective trial to examine whether angioplasty confers benefit in patients with low-grade renal artery stenosis.

Keywords

Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular complications, Intervention, Renal artery stenosis, Renal function, Renovascular hypertension, Journal Article, Review

Citation

de Leeuw, P W, Postma, C T, Spiering, W & Kroon, A A 2018, 'Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis : Should we Intervene Earlier?', Current Hypertension Reports, vol. 20, no. 4, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-018-0829-3