Uncertainty in hydromorphological and ecological modelling of lowland river floodplains resulting from land cover classification errors
Publication date
2012
Authors
Straatsma, M.W.
Perk, M. van der
Schipper, A.M.
Nooij, R.J.W. de
Leuven, R.S.E.W.
Huthoff, F.
Middelkoop, H.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
(c) UU Universiteit Utrecht, 2012
Abstract
Land cover maps provide essential input data for various hydromorphological and ecological models, but
the effect of land cover classification errors on these models has not been quantified systematically. This
paper presents the uncertainty in hydromorphological and ecological model output for a large lowland
river depending on the classification accuracy (CA) of a land cover map. Using four different models, we
quantified the uncertainty for the three distributaries of the Rhine River in The Netherlands with respect
to: (1) hydrodynamics (WAQUA model), (2) annual average suspended sediment deposition (SEDIFLUX
model), (3) ecotoxicological hazards of contaminated sediment for a bird of prey, and (4) floodplain
importance for desired habitat types and species (BIO-SAFE model). We carried out two Monte Carlo
(n ¼ 15) analyses: one at a 69% land cover CA, the other at 95% CA. Subsequently we ran all four models
with the 30 realizations as input.
The error in the current land cover map gave an uncertainty in design water levels of up to 19 cm.
Overbank sediment deposition varied up to 100% in the area bordering the main channel, but when
aggregated to the whole study area, the variation in sediment trapping efficiency was negligible. The
ecotoxicological hazards, represented by the fraction of Little Owl habitat with potential cadmium
exposure levels exceeding a corresponding toxicity threshold of 148 mg d 1, varied between 54 and 60%,
aggregated over the distributaries. The 68% confidence interval of floodplain importance for protected
and endangered species varied between 10 and 15%. Increasing the classification accuracy to 95%
significantly lowered the uncertainty of all models applied. Compared to landscaping measures, the
effects due to the uncertainty in the land cover map are of the same order of magnitude. Given high
financial costs of these landscaping measures, increasing the classification accuracy of land cover maps is
a prerequisite for improving the assessment of the efficiency of landscaping measures.
Keywords
Biodiversity, Ecotoxicological hazards, Floodplain vegetation, Hydrodynamic uncertainty, Monte Carlo analysis, Rhine river, Special areas of nature conservation, Suspended sediment deposition