Validation of non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring during carotid endarterectomy
Files
Publication date
2016-09-01
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
taverne
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy require strict arterial blood pressure (BP) control to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion. In this study we tested whether non-invasive beat-to-beat Nexfin finger BP (BPfin) can replace invasive beat-to-beat radial artery BP (BPrad) in this setting. METHODS: In 25 consecutive patients (median age 71 yr) scheduled for carotid endarterectomy and receiving general anaesthesia, BPfin and BPrad were monitored simultaneously and ipsilaterally during the 30-min period surrounding carotid artery cross-clamping. Validation was guided by the standard set by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), which considers a BP monitor adequate when bias (precision) is <5 (8) mm Hg, respectively. RESULTS: BPfin vs BPrad bias (precision) was -3.3 (10.8), 6.1 (5.7) and 3.5 (5.2) mm Hg for systolic, diastolic, and mean BP, respectively. One subject was excluded due to a poor quality BP curve. In another subject, mean BPfin overestimated mean BPrad by 13.5 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Mean BPfin could be considered as an alternative for mean BPrad during a carotid endarterectomy, based on the AAMI criteria. In 23 of 24 patients, the use of mean BPfin would not lead to decisions to adjust mean BPrad values outside the predefined BP threshold. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01451294.
Keywords
carotid endarterectomy, measurement techniques, arterial pressure, Nexfin, non-invasive continuous arterial pressure measurement, Taverne, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Journal Article
Citation
Heusdens, J F, Lof, S, Pennekamp, C W A, Specken-Welleweerd, J C, de Borst, G J, van Klei, W A, van Wolfswinkel, L & Immink, R V 2016, 'Validation of non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring during carotid endarterectomy', British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 316-323. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew268