Open data work: understanding open data usage from a practice lens

Publication date

2020-03

Authors

Ruijer, ErnaISNI 0000000492918483
Grimmelikhuijsen, StephanORCID 0000-0002-1553-6065ISNI 0000000390486333
van den Berg, Jochem
Meijer, AlbertISNI 0000000078931893

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

During recent years, the amount of data released on platforms by public administrations around the world have exploded. Open government data platforms are aimed at enhancing transparency and participation. Even though the promises of these platforms are high, their full potential has not yet been reached. Scholars have identified technical and quality barriers of open data usage. Although useful, these issues fail to acknowledge that the meaning of open data also depends on the context and people involved. In this study we analyze open data usage from a practice lens – as a social construction that emerges over time in interaction with governments and users in a specific context – to enhance our understanding of the role of context and agency in the development of open data platforms. This study is based on innovative action-based research in which civil servants’ and citizens’ initiatives collaborate to find solutions for public problems using an open data platform. It provides an insider perspective of Open Data Work. The findings show that an absence of a shared cognitive framework for understanding open data and a lack of high-quality datasets can prevent processes of collaborative learning. Our contextual approach stresses the need for open data practices that work on the basis of rich interactions with users rather than government-centric implementations.

Keywords

citizen participation, e-government, open government, open government data, transparency, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration

Citation

Ruijer, E, Grimmelikhuijsen, S, van den Berg, J & Meijer, A 2020, 'Open data work : understanding open data usage from a practice lens', International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317753068