The use of local and global ordering strategies in number line estimation in early childhood

Publication date

2018-09-18

Authors

van 't Noordende, J.E.ISNI 0000000419579374
Volman, M.J.M.ISNI 0000000388727839
Leseman, P.P.M.ISNI 0000000384213566
Moeller, Korbinian
Dackermann, Tanja
Kroesbergen, E.H.ISNI 0000000392263467

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

A lot of research has been devoted to number line estimation in primary school. However, less is known about the early onset of number line estimation before children enter formal education. We propose that ordering strategies are building blocks of number line estimation in early childhood. In a longitudinal study, children completed a non-symbolic number line estimation task at age 3.5 and 5 years. Two ordering strategies were identified based on the children's estimation patterns: local and global ordering. Local ordering refers to the correct ordering of successive quantities, whereas global ordering refers to the correct ordering of all quantities across the number line. Results indicated a developmental trend for both strategies. The percentage of children applying local and global ordering strategies increased steeply from 3.5 to 5 years of age. Moreover, children used more advanced local and global ordering strategies at 5 years of age. Importantly, level of strategy use was related to more traditional number line estimation outcome measures, such as estimation accuracy and regression fit scores. These results provide evidence that children use dynamic ordering strategies when solving the number line estimation task in early stages of numerical development.

Keywords

Global ordering, Local ordering, Number line estimation, Numerical development, Strategy use, General Psychology

Citation

Van 't Noordende, J E, Volman, M J M, Leseman, P P M, Moeller, K, Dackermann, T & Kroesbergen, E H 2018, 'The use of local and global ordering strategies in number line estimation in early childhood', Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, no. SEP, 1562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01562