Article 53 and Minimum Protection by the European Court of Human Rights

Publication date

2022-11

Authors

Gerards, J.H.ORCID 0000-0003-3490-2232ISNI 0000000018898905

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

It is often emphasised that the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR or Convention) offers only minimum protection and states are allowed to offer additional guarantees. Indeed, Article 53 ECHR obliges the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to respect such national guarantees if they go beyond the Convention. Similar provisions are usually included in human rights treaties as ‘priority clauses’,which mean that human rights bodies should respect more protective national laws.In such a reading, Article 53 could both add to and detract from the protection offered by the Convention, especially in cases where national and Convention rights clash. Based on an analysis of the Court’s case law, this paper shows that the Court does not rely on Article 53 in such conflicting rights cases, but rather prefers to use avoidance and balancing strategies. Instead, the Court uses Article 53 to reinforce national fundamental rights protection, thereby reducing the risk of harming the minimum level of protection provided by the Convention.

Keywords

minimum protection of fundamental rights, Article 53 echr, European Court of Human Rights, subsidiarity, most favourable treatment, priority, conflicts of rightS, balancing, reinforcement interpretation

Citation

Gerards, J 2022, 'Article 53 and Minimum Protection by the European Court of Human Rights', European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 451–480. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10053