Endoscopic biopsy and EUS for the detection of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Publication date

2016-05

Authors

van Rossum, P S N
Goense, Lucas
Meziani, Jihane
Reitsma, Johannes J BISNI 0000000389855461
Siersema, Peter DISNI 0000000393766648
Vleggaar, Frank PORCID 0000-0001-8664-5130ISNI 0000000390476661
van Vulpen, MarcoISNI 0000000397109354
Meijer, Gert JORCID 0000-0001-7275-319XISNI 0000000389724736
Ruurda, J PORCID 0000-0001-6584-1677ISNI 0000000397120932
van Hillegersberg, RichardORCID 0000-0002-7134-261XISNI 0000000387532685

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Accurate determination of residual cancer status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer could assist in selecting the optimal treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic biopsy and EUS after nCRT for detecting residual cancer at the primary tumor site (ypT+) and regional lymph nodes (ypN+) as opposed to a pathologic complete response (ypT0 and ypN0). METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched. The analysis included diagnostic studies reporting on the accuracy of endoscopic biopsy or EUS in detecting residual cancer versus complete response after nCRT for esophageal cancer with histopathology as reference standard. Bivariate random-effects models were used to estimate pooled sensitivities and specificities and examine sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies, comprising 12 endoscopic biopsy studies (1,281 patients), 11 EUS studies reporting on ypT-status (593 patients), and 10 EUS studies reporting on ypN-status (602 patients), were included. Pooled estimates for sensitivity of endoscopic biopsy after nCRT for predicting ypT+ was 34.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.0%-44.1%) and for specificity 91.0% (95% CI, 85.6%-94.5%). Pooled estimates for sensitivity of EUS after nCRT was 96.4% (95% CI, 91.7%-98.5%) and for specificity 10.9% (95% CI, 3.5%-29.0%) for detecting ypT+, and 62.0% (95% CI, 46.0%-75.7%) and 56.7% (95% CI, 41.8%-70.5%) for detecting ypN+, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic biopsy after nCRT is a specific but not sensitive method for detecting residual esophageal cancer. Although EUS after nCRT yields a high sensitivity, only a limited number of patients will have negative findings at EUS with still a substantial false-negative rate. Furthermore, EUS provides only moderate accuracy for detecting residual lymph node involvement. Based on these findings, these endoscopic modalities cannot be used to withhold surgical treatment in test-negative patients after nCRT.

Keywords

Taverne, Journal Article, Review, Meta-Analysis

Citation

van Rossum, P S N, Goense, L, Meziani, J, Reitsma, J B, Siersema, P D, Vleggaar, F P, van Vulpen, M, Meijer, G J, Ruurda, J P & van Hillegersberg, R 2016, 'Endoscopic biopsy and EUS for the detection of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 866-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.11.026