A simple bedside test for upper extremity impairment after stroke: Validation of the Utrecht Armhand test

Publication date

2009

Authors

Kruitwagen-van Reenen, Esther T
Post, Marcel W.M.ISNI 0000000393366361
Mulder-Bouwens, K.
Visser-Meily, Johanna MaISNI 0000000387554577

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

License

Abstract

Purpose. To examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability, criterion validity and responsiveness of the Utrecht Armhand Test UAT, a quick and easy assessment method for upper extremity impairment after stroke. Method. Study 1 N 29: Repeated administration of the UAT at admission and discharge; comparison with scores on the Fugl-Meyer test FM, Action Research Arm test ARA and Self-Care scale of the Functional Independence Measure FIM. Study 2 N 192: Admission of the UAT and Frenchay Arm Test at admission FAT and discharge. Computation of Spearman correlations between UAT and FAT and comparison of the Effect Size and the Standardised Response Mean of both measures. Results. Study 1: Spearman correlations between UAT and FM were 0.93 at admission and 0.94 at discharge. Correlations with ARA and FIM were also high: 0.90 and 0.76 at admission, and 0.89 and 0.73 at discharge. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were excellent weighted κ 0.980.99. Study 2: Correlations between UAT and FAT were 0.93 at admission and 0.90 at discharge. The mean UAT score improved from 3.7 at admission up to 4.6 at discharge p < 0.001. The Effect Size and Standardised Response Mean of the UAT were better than those of the FAT. Conclusion. The UAT is a simple, valid and reliable bedside test for the evaluation of upper extremity impairment after stroke.

Keywords

Arm, Assessment, Motor activity, Outcome assessment, Rehabilitation, Stroke, Rehabilitation

Citation

Reenen, E T K V, Post, M W M, Mulder-Bouwens, K & Visser-Meily, J M A 2009, 'A simple bedside test for upper extremity impairment after stroke : Validation of the Utrecht Armhand test', Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 1338-1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280902846855