Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology

Publication date

2015-12

Authors

Debray, ThomasORCID 0000-0002-1790-2719ISNI 0000000390283878
Moons, Karel G MISNI 0000000390720943
van Valkenhoef, Gert
Efthimiou, Orestis
Hummel, Noemi
Groenwold, Rolf H.H.ISNI 0000000394374611
Reitsma, Johannes J BISNI 0000000389855461
GetReal methods review group

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis is an increasingly used approach for synthesizing and investigating treatment effect estimates. Over the past few years, numerous methods for conducting an IPD meta-analysis (IPD-MA) have been proposed, often making different assumptions and modeling choices while addressing a similar research question. We conducted a literature review to provide an overview of methods for performing an IPD-MA using evidence from clinical trials or non-randomized studies when investigating treatment efficacy. With this review, we aim to assist researchers in choosing the appropriate methods and provide recommendations on their implementation when planning and conducting an IPD-MA.

Keywords

meta-analysis, IPD, evidence synthesis, review, RCT, non-randomized intervention studies, NRSI, cross-design, Statistics and Probability, Epidemiology

Citation

Debray, T P A, Moons, K G M, van Valkenhoef, G, Efthimiou, O, Hummel, N, Groenwold, R H H, Reitsma, J B & GetReal methods review group 2015, 'Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis : a review of the methodology', Research synthesis methods, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1160