Editorial: Special issue: Nature-based solutions for reducing disaster risk. What is the evidence?

Publication date

2025-06

Authors

Sudmeier-Rieux, Karen
Galvin, Stephen
Nehren, Udo Michael
Moos, Christine
Vicarelli, Marta
Walz, Yvonne
Emerton, Lucy
Triyanti, AnnisaORCID 0000-0001-5524-7551ISNI 0000000492958717
Doswald, Nathalie

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Editorial
Open Access logo

License

cc_by

Abstract

Nearly two decades ago, the Indian Ocean tsunami created a devastating human tragedy, leaving many questions in its wake as to the role that mangroves may have played in saving lives and livelihoods. Over the following decade, these questions led to the creation of a new field of study: the role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction, or Eco-DRR. After 2020, Eco-DRR became quasi-synonymous with ‘Nature-based Solutions for disaster risk reduction’, with a few notable differences. What changed as a result of the Indian Ocean tsunami was an increased awareness that ecosystems could - and should - be part of discourse and portfolios of investments in disaster risk reduction (DRR). Over the next two decades, this awareness grew in three phases: 1) 2005–2014: the ‘convincing stage’; 2) 2015–2020: the ‘mainstreaming stage’ 3) 2020: ‘the blue-printing stage’.

Keywords

Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem approaches, Methodological advances, Nature-based solutions, General Environmental Science

Citation

Sudmeier-Rieux, K, Galvin, S, Nehren, U M, Moos, C, Vicarelli, M, Walz, Y, Emerton, L, Triyanti, A & Doswald, N 2025, 'Editorial : Special issue: Nature-based solutions for reducing disaster risk. What is the evidence?', Nature-Based Solutions, vol. 7, 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100207