Editorial: Special issue: Nature-based solutions for reducing disaster risk. What is the evidence?
Publication date
2025-06
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Editorial
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
cc_by
Abstract
Nearly two decades ago, the Indian Ocean tsunami created a devastating human tragedy, leaving many questions in its wake as to the role that mangroves may have played in saving lives and livelihoods. Over the following decade, these questions led to the creation of a new field of study: the role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction, or Eco-DRR. After 2020, Eco-DRR became quasi-synonymous with ‘Nature-based Solutions for disaster risk reduction’, with a few notable differences. What changed as a result of the Indian Ocean tsunami was an increased awareness that ecosystems could - and should - be part of discourse and portfolios of investments in disaster risk reduction (DRR). Over the next two decades, this awareness grew in three phases: 1) 2005–2014: the ‘convincing stage’; 2) 2015–2020: the ‘mainstreaming stage’ 3) 2020: ‘the blue-printing stage’.
Keywords
Disaster risk reduction, Ecosystem approaches, Methodological advances, Nature-based solutions, General Environmental Science
Citation
Sudmeier-Rieux, K, Galvin, S, Nehren, U M, Moos, C, Vicarelli, M, Walz, Y, Emerton, L, Triyanti, A & Doswald, N 2025, 'Editorial : Special issue: Nature-based solutions for reducing disaster risk. What is the evidence?', Nature-Based Solutions, vol. 7, 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100207