Assessing students’ understanding of models of biological processes: a revised framework.

Publication date

2019-03-19

Authors

Jansen, SusanneISNI 0000000492481672
Knippels, Marie-ChristineORCID 0000-0003-4989-1863ISNI 0000000396739848
Joolingen, Wouter VanISNI 0000000393908810

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Models are very important tools when learning and communicating about science. Models used in secondary school biology education range from concrete scale models, such as a model of a skeleton, to abstract concept-process models, such as a visualisation of meiosis. Understanding these concept-process models requires a profound understanding of the concept of models and how they are used in biology. This study evaluates the framework from Grünkorn, J., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2014). Assessing students’ understandings of biological models and their use in science to evaluate a theoretical framework for its use in assessing students’ understanding of biological concept-process models. Four additions were required to extend the applicability of the framework to concept-process models. We were also able to give an indication of students’ current level of understanding of these models, showing room for improvement in all aspects of understanding. Since concept-process models have a central place in many scientific disciplines, it is important that students have a deep understanding of the nature, application and limitations of these models. The current study contributes to assessing the way students reason with concept-process models. Knowing how to improve students’ view on the use of concept-process models in biology may lead to higher scientific literacy.

Keywords

Models & modelling, nature of science, scientific literacy, Biology education

Citation

Jansen, S, Knippels, M C P J & van Joolingen, W R 2019, 'Assessing students’ understanding of models of biological processes: a revised framework.', International Journal of Science Education, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 981-994. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1582821