Speed matters: relationship between speed of eye movements and modification of aversive autobiographical memories

Publication date

2015-04-07

Authors

van Veen, S.C.ISNI 0000000419570855
van Schie, KevinISNI 0000000419570724
Wijngaards, LeoniekISNI 0000000396194905
Littel, M.ISNI 0000000352307314
Engelhard, Iris M.ISNI 000000013791287X
van den Hout, MarcelISNI 0000000044378292

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is an efficacious treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder. In EMDR, patients recall a distressing memory and simultaneously make eye movements (EM). Both tasks are considered to require limited working memory (WM) resources. Because this leaves fewer resources available for memory retrieval, the memory should become less vivid and less emotional during future recall. In EMDR analogue studies, a standardized procedure has been used, in which participants receive the same dual task manipulation of 1 EM cycle per second (1 Hz). From a WM perspective, the WM taxation of the dual task might be titrated to the WM taxation of the memory image. We hypothesized that highly vivid images are more affected by high WM taxation and less vivid images are more affected by low WM taxation. In study 1, 34 participants performed a reaction time task, and rated image vividness, and difficulty of retrieving an image, during five speeds of EM and no EM. Both a high WM taxing frequency (fast EM; 1.2 Hz) and a low WM taxing frequency (slow EM; 0.8 Hz) were selected. In study 2, 72 participants recalled three highly vivid aversive autobiographical memory images (n = 36) or three less vivid images (n = 36) under each of three conditions: recall + fast EM, recall + slow EM, or recall only. Multi-level modeling revealed a consistent pattern for all outcome measures: recall + fast EM led to less emotional, less vivid and more difficult to retrieve images than recall + slow EM and recall only, and the effects of recall + slow EM felt consistently in between the effects of recall + fast EM and recall only, but only differed significantly from recall + fast EM. Crucially, image vividness did not interact with condition on the decrease of emotionality over time, which was inconsistent with the prediction. Implications for understanding the mechanisms of action in memory modification and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

EMDR, Eye movements, Autobiographical memory, Working memory, Vividness, Emotionality, General Psychology, Clinical Psychology

Citation

van Veen, S, van Schie, K, Wijngaards, L, Littel, M, Engelhard, I & van den Hout, M 2015, 'Speed matters : relationship between speed of eye movements and modification of aversive autobiographical memories', Frontiers in Psychiatry [E], vol. 6, 45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00045