Gentrification of Progressive Red Light Districts and New Moral Geographies: The case of Amsterdam and Zurich

Publication date

2017

Authors

van Liempt, IlseISNI 0000000111933314
Chimienti, M.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

Abstract

Even though there is a long tradition of red-light districts (RLD) being concentrated within the city centre, gentrification policies in many European cities now aim at spatially dispersing the sex market (and its workers) to the fringes of the city. Moving RLDs out of the city centre (or transforming them into more-upscale entertainment provision) calls into question the physical place allotted to sex work in our cities, as well as the moral geography behind these decisions. This paper examines urban regeneration processes in two particular European cities – Amsterdam and Zurich – both cities with a long history of progressive drug and sex-work policies where sex work has been part of the visible urban fabric. In the paper we look at urban policies and the legal framework, as well as at moral reasoning and discourses around the legitimacy of moving sex-workers away from city centres. We argue that in both cities moral arguments play an important role in the legitimization of the transformation of the RLD which contributes to a new race and gender order that stigmatises sex-workers as a group as if they were all victims of trafficking.

Keywords

Gentrification, Red Light Districts, Amsterdam, Zurich, Human Trafficking, SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth, SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities, SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Citation

van Liempt, I C & Chimienti, M 2017, 'Gentrification of Progressive Red Light Districts and New Moral Geographies: The case of Amsterdam and Zurich', Gender, Place, and Culture, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1569-1586. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1382452