On bar growth and decay during interannual net offshore migration
Publication date
2012
Authors
Walstra, D.J.R.
Reniers, A.J.H.M.
Ranasinghe, R.
Roelvink, J.A.
Ruessink, B.G.
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
(c) UU Universiteit Utrecht, 2012
Abstract
Multiple bar systems often show a cyclic net offshore directed migration with return periods on the order of
years. Generally, a bar is generated near the shoreline, grows in height and width, while migrating offshore
before finally decaying at the seaward limit of the surf zone. Based on a three-year hindcast of a bar cycle
at Noordwijk (Netherlands) and on additional synthetic runs using a wave-averaged cross-shore process
model, this study identifies the dominant mechanisms that govern the bar amplitude growth and decay
during net interannual offshore migration. The bar amplitude response is particularly sensitive to the water
depth above the bar crest, hXb, and the angle of wave incidence, θ. These variables largely control the amount
of waves breaking on the bar and the strength and cross-shore distribution of the associated longshore current.
The longshore current has itsmaximumlandward of the bar crest, inducing additional stirring of sediment on the
landward bar slope and trough. The enhanced sediment concentration in the trough region shifts the cross-shore
transports peak landward of the bar crest forcing bar amplitude growth during offshore migration. For increased
hXb-values wave breaking becomes less frequent, consequently reducing the influence of the longshore current
on sediment stirring. Therefore, the resulting dominance of the cross-shore current results in a sediment transport
peak at the bar crest causing bar amplitude decay. All four types of bar response (viz. all combinations of
onshore/offshore migration and bar amplitude growth/decay) can occur for a single wave height and wave
period combination, depending on hXb and θ. Additional hindcast runs inwhich the wave directionwas assumed
time-invariant confirmed that hXb and θ largely control the transient bar amplitude response.
Keywords
Sand bars, Bar growth, Bar decay, Process based modeling, Unibest-TC, Cyclic bar behavior