Diverse origins of the myofibroblast-implications for kidney fibrosis

Publication date

2015-01-01

Authors

Falke, Lucas L.
Gholizadeh Soltani, ShimaISNI 0000000493299098
Goldschmeding, Roel
Kok, Robbert JanORCID 0000-0003-4933-3968ISNI 0000000392754805
Nguyen, Tri Q.

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article
Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Fibrosis is the common end point of chronic kidney disease. The persistent production of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors leads to an ongoing process of extracellular matrix production that eventually disrupts the normal functioning of the organ. During fibrosis, the myofibroblast is commonly regarded as the predominant effector cell. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated a diverse origin of myofibroblasts in kidney fibrosis. Proposed major contributors of myofibroblasts include bone marrow-derived fibroblasts, tubular epithelial cells, endothelial cells, pericytes and interstitial fibroblasts; the published data, however, have not yet clearly defined the relative contribution of these different cellular sources. Myofibroblasts have been reported to originate from various sources, irrespective of the nature of the initial damage responsible for the induction of kidney fibrosis. Here, we review the possible relevance of the diversity of myofibroblast progenitors in kidney fibrosis and the implications for the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Specifically, we discuss the current status of preclinical and clinical antifibrotic therapy and describe targeting strategies that might help support resident and circulating cells to maintain or regain their original functional differentiation state. Such strategies might help these cells resist their transition to a myofibroblast phenotype to prevent, or even reverse, the fibrotic state.

Keywords

Taverne, Nephrology

Citation

Falke, L L, Gholizadeh Soltani, S, Goldschmeding, R, Kok, R J & Nguyen, T Q 2015, 'Diverse origins of the myofibroblast-implications for kidney fibrosis', Nature Reviews. Nephrology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2014.246