Workflow for automatic renal perfusion quantification using ASL-MRI and machine learning

Publication date

2022-02

Authors

Bones, Isabell K
Bos, CORCID 0000-0002-9246-3242ISNI 0000000388845122
Moonen, C. T. W.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-3121ISNI 0000000038813649
Hendrikse, JeroenISNI 0000000390964171
van Stralen, MORCID 0000-0002-3051-5000ISNI 0000000395962765

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

cc_by_nc

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical applicability of renal arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI is hampered because of time consuming and observer dependent post-processing, including manual segmentation of the cortex to obtain cortical renal blood flow (RBF). Machine learning has proven its value in medical image segmentation, including the kidneys. This study presents a fully automatic workflow for renal cortex perfusion quantification by including machine learning-based segmentation. Methods: Fully automatic workflow was achieved by construction of a cascade of 3 U-nets to replace manual segmentation in ASL quantification. All 1.5T ASL-MRI data, including M 0, T 1, and ASL label-control images, from 10 healthy volunteers was used for training (dataset 1). Trained cascade performance was validated on 4 additional volunteers (dataset 2). Manual segmentations were generated by 2 observers, yielding reference and second observer segmentations. To validate the intended use of the automatic segmentations, manual and automatic RBF values in mL/min/100 g were compared. Results: Good agreement was found between automatic and manual segmentations on dataset 1 (dice score = 0.78 ± 0.04), which was in line with inter-observer variability (dice score = 0.77 ± 0.02). Good agreement was confirmed on dataset 2 (dice score = 0.75 ± 0.03). Moreover, similar cortical RBF was obtained with automatic or manual segmentations, on average and at subject level; with 211 ± 31 mL/min/100 g and 208 ± 31 mL/min/100 g (P <.05), respectively, with narrow limits of agreement at −11 and 4.6 mL/min/100 g. RBF accuracy with automated segmentations was confirmed on dataset 2. Conclusion: Our proposed method automates ASL quantification without compromising RBF accuracy. With quick processing and without observer dependence, renal ASL-MRI is more attractive for clinical application as well as for longitudinal and multi-center studies.

Keywords

automatic ASL quantification, automatic segmentation, machine learning, RBF, renal ASL MRI, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Journal Article

Citation

Bones, I K, Bos, C, Moonen, C, Hendrikse, J & van Stralen, M 2022, 'Workflow for automatic renal perfusion quantification using ASL-MRI and machine learning', Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 800-809. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29016