GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology

Publication date

2016-09-01

Authors

Efthimiou, Orestis
Debray, ThomasORCID 0000-0002-1790-2719ISNI 0000000390283878
van Valkenhoef, Gert
Trelle, Sven
Panayidou, Klea
Moons, Karel G MISNI 0000000390720943
Reitsma, Johannes J BISNI 0000000389855461
Shang, Aijing
Salanti, Georgia

Editors

Advisors

Supervisors

Document Type

Article

Collections

Open Access logo

License

taverne

Abstract

Pairwise meta-analysis is an established statistical tool for synthesizing evidence from multiple trials, but it is informative only about the relative efficacy of two specific interventions. The usefulness of pairwise meta-analysis is thus limited in real-life medical practice, where many competing interventions may be available for a certain condition and studies informing some of the pairwise comparisons may be lacking. This commonly encountered scenario has led to the development of network meta-analysis (NMA). In the last decade, several applications, methodological developments, and empirical studies in NMA have been published, and the area is thriving as its relevance to public health is increasingly recognized. This article presents a review of the relevant literature on NMA methodology aiming to pinpoint the developments that have appeared in the field.

Keywords

comparing multiple interventions, indirect treatment comparison, mixed-treatment comparison, multiple-treatment meta-analysis, Taverne, Education, Journal Article, Review

Citation

Efthimiou, O, Debray, T P A, van Valkenhoef, G, Trelle, S, Panayidou, K, Moons, K G M, Reitsma, J B, Shang, A & Salanti, G 2016, 'GetReal in network meta-analysis : a review of the methodology', Research synthesis methods, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 236-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1195