Seismic and mechanical anisotropy and the past and present deformation of the Australian lithosphere
Publication date
2003
Authors
Simons, Frederik J.
Hilst, R.D. van der
Editors
Advisors
Supervisors
DOI
Document Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
License
Abstract
We interpret the three-dimensional seismic wave-speed structure of the Australian upper mantle by comparing its
azimuthal anisotropy to estimates of past and present lithospheric deformation. We infer the fossil strain field from
the orientation of gravity anomalies relative to topography, bypassing the need to extrapolate crustal measures, and
derive the current direction of mantle deformation from present-day plate motion. Our observations provide the depth
resolution necessary to distinguish fossil from contemporaneous deformation. The distribution of azimuthal seismic
anisotropy is determined from multi-mode surface-wave propagation. Mechanical anisotropy, or the directional
variation of isostatic compensation, is a proxy for the fossil strain field and is derived from a spectral coherence
analysis of digital gravity and topography data in two wavelength bands. The joint interpretation of seismic and
tectonic data resolves a rheological transition in the Australian upper mantle. At depths shallower than V150^200
km strong seismic anisotropy forms complex patterns. In this regime the seismic fast axes are at large angles to the
directions of principal shortening, defining a mechanically coupled crust^mantle lid deformed by orogenic processes
dominated by transpression. Here, seismic anisotropy may be considered ‘frozen’, which suggests that past
deformation has left a coherent imprint on much of the lithospheric depth profile. The azimuthal seismic anisotropy
below V200 km is weaker and preferentially aligned with the direction of the rapid motion of the Indo-Australian
plate. The alignment of the fast axes with the direction of present-day absolute plate motion is indicative of
deformation by simple shear of a dry olivine mantle. Motion expressed in the hot-spot reference frame matches the
seismic observations better than the no-net-rotation reference frame. Thus, seismic anisotropy supports the notion
that the hot-spot reference frame is the most physically reasonable. Independently from plate motion models, seismic
anisotropy can be used to derive a best-fitting direction of overall mantle shear.
Keywords
anisotropy, tomography, deformation, rheology, Australia